.
Abstract: The transparency and control of earnings are major concerns for gig economy workers across platforms such as ride-hailing and food delivery. While workers advocate for greater transparency, platforms selectively disclose information, shaping workers’ decision-making and earnings. Recently, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has highlighted lack of transparency as a key issue, and platforms have responded by introducing upfront pay quotes that provide per-trip compensation details for workers. Using a game-theoretic model, we analyze the strategic interactions between platforms and workers, incorporating tools from information design to examine how different transparency policies—specifically, flat commission rates versus upfront quote—shape equilibrium outcomes. We find that greater transparency can paradoxically increase platform control, as it allows platforms to fine-tune pay structures in ways that ultimately reduce worker autonomy. Moreover, while full information benefits the platform when it has flexibility in commission setting, it can backfire under commitment constraints, leading to lower profits than a no-information policy. Our findings highlight that transparency is not inherently beneficial for workers. Instead, its effects depend on how it interacts with pay policies. In particular, simple mechanisms, such as a fixed commission rate, can provide workers with more stability and bargaining power than per-trip transparency. These insights offer important guidance for policymakers and platform designers navigating the trade-offs of transparency in the gig economy.